so which is the best permutation of obfuscation?
contenders:
ob-fu-fucking-scation
ob-fu-goddamn-scation
why i ask:
to the fucktard who is taking up tv time: you are good at OB-FU-GODDAMN-SCATING the issues (if you know what that word means) about which you pontificate. i'd like to remind you that WE ARE NOT STUPID!!! you're a fucking retard and your followers are even worse because they rely on talking points put out by your people, thereby eliminating their need to think! they're IGNORANT APES that only need to imitate what you say and do (or what your people say and do because you don't have very impressive leadership skills). and it appears that you yourself rely on those very same talking points (i can tell because you keep getting your lines wrong; nobody on your staff department of truth theatrical staff (writers, choreographers and the like) would EVER feed you a grammatcially incorrect sentence, would they?) and those points were put out by SOMEONE (which was obviously not you, again, evidenced by the constant marring of your lines)... so, with all due respect, you too are an ape!
ugh. now my feathers are all ruffled. i should turn off cspan.
11.10.06
obfuscation
Posted by
la flaquita
at
10:43
Labels: alliteration, idiocy, intellectual laziness
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
you know, the majority of people that listen to and watch certain shows/networks aren't there for the news or because they agree with the viewpoint. it's because they so vehemently disagree and think said things are ludicrous and they are waiting for the next ridiculous thing, say, Ann Coulter says next so then they can be agitated and pontificate about it. Sometimes I think you are becoming one of those people.....but I have to love the fact that you are involved and have a point of view!
au contraire, ma chérie.
yesterday i turned the press conference off. it was making me nauseous. fox news frightens me (like real fear and anxiety, not only sarcastically)... i can't stand their political commentators (all yelling and little reasoning) and i can only take randi rhodes (yes, a known LIBERAL radio host) in short spurts.
plus my shrink said it's not good for me to watch programs that get me all agitated!
but i know what you mean. maybe mann coulter her(him?)self does that just to react and have content to put into her books?
ok, ok. it's just that it's so easy to permutate "ann" into "mann."
Post a Comment